DNA

I was participating in a conversation recently about evangelism. A question was being raised about how we can get indolent churches to wake up and start noticing the world outside their walls.

There were a few of us contributing to the conversation who were jaded, and a bit cynical, about whether changing the direction of a church is even possible. “Never say never,” we’ve been warned. Okay, there are a few churches that change.

But I was intrigued by an Alban Institute article today, to the effect that changing a congregation’s basic nature is often strongly resisted by congregational insiders. Arthur Paul Boers writes the following.

While we may grasp the benefits of dealing with difficult behavior in firm and responsible ways and while many leaders may also be persuaded of these benefits (at least in theory), do not expect such changed approaches to come easily. Systems tend toward “homeostasis”—that is, they like to return to things as they were before.

When people change their roles in a system, especially when they move toward more autonomy, independence, or differentiation, the rest of the group may try to persuade (or even force) the person to resume a previous role and stance. In fact, the more progress a leader makes toward healthy functioning, the stronger the reaction will be.

Perhaps the answer to creating change with respect to the relationship between churches and culture is not to try to change exisiting churches but to plant (or start) lots of new churches. Churches that do not have years of institutional baggage that have to be finessed.

Eventually new churches become old churches, but that wouldn’t be a bad thing if they were busy reproducing while they were young and before change becomes a threat.

2 thoughts on “DNA

  1. We are helping the church ( followers of Jesus) to engage itself in the neighborhoods they live in. We are giving them the tools to do it well and keep it simple.
    It’s working like gang busters. we are seeing real transformation. Most of the participants are enjoying it more than their own sunday services they attend. Many of the participants are non believers who enjoy interacting because its neighborhood driven by neighbors. The best part about it is we interact with most of the people on a regular basis because they live within walking distance to us. It can be done. It does work.

    Steven
    simplechurch.tv

  2. I am planting a church, and all of my activity and contact is outside the walls of conventional church. I get warm welcomes virtually everywhere I go. As you said earlier, the limits we experience are self-imposed. Thanks for the comment.

    Bruce

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

MonoLogue

Writing is life!

The Lettered Paradise

The art is long, and life is short.

Perfect Chaos

The Philosophy Blog of Steven Colborne

Dining with Donald

Donald on Dining in and Out.

BGR

Tech and entertainment news, reviews, opinions and insights

Three Practices

When people like each other the rules change....

Pete Enns

Just another WordPress.com site

john pavlovitz

Stuff That Needs To Be Said

Jesus Creed

Writing is life!

Experimental Theology

Writing is life!

Dei-liberations

Thoughts on God and World

%d bloggers like this: